Thursday, June 7, 2007

Should the Gorge Scenic Act be modified? Voice your opinion at an important meeting on Monday

from: http://www.gorgecommission.org/recresorts.cfm
Second Gorge Commission Event onRecreation Resort Issues to Include Open Comment Period

The Columbia River Gorge Commission staff will host an event including an open meeting and small-group discussions to provide an opportunity to express views on a possible amendment to the Management Plan for the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. Such an amendment would provide a framework with criteria to review conversion of an industrial site, the Broughton Mill property, to a recreation resort.

The meeting is scheduled for Monday June 11, from 4:45 p.m. – 8:30 p.m. at the PioneerCenter, 501 NE Washington St., in White Salmon. An introduction to the meeting and the evening’s agenda will be provided from 4:45 p.m. – 5:00 p.m.

This meeting is the second of a series of public meetings on this topic. The first, held May 30, featured panel discussions about issues to be considered as part of a plan amendment process. The panelists, who represented key stakeholder agencies and organizations, addressed questions about issues regarding recreation and other river uses, and potential positive and negative impacts to local communities and the economy.

About 80 people attended, and more than 130 comments were submitted through written comment cards during the panel discussions. Frequently-mentioned themes in the comments included: traffic congestion and safety, environmental impacts, the extent of economic benefits versus negative impacts, and possible demands to public services and infrastructure. A number of participants questioned the need for the plan amendment, and several expressed frustration at not having the opportunity to voice their comments verbally. A draft summary of comments, as well as a verbatim record of the comment cards, will be available for review on the Commission’s website prior to the June 11 meeting.

Based on the outcome of the May 30th workshop, the Commission has decided to modify its initial plan for a follow-up event to include additional opportunity for the public to comment directly on the possible plan amendment for conversion of the Broughton Mill site to a recreation resort. The June 11 meeting will feature a public comment period from 5:00 to 6:30, with small-group discussions on issues identified in the first workshop starting at 6:45. Additional time to allow anyone who didn’t have the opportunity to comment in the initial comment session will be provided following the small group discussion.

Gorge Commission Executive Director Jill Arens said “While we achieved one goal of gaining more information to help refine issues and potential impacts, we also heard clearly from a number of participants regarding their dissatisfaction with the workshop format and their desire to speak directly to the group.”

The Commission is asking those who wish to participate to make their comments concise (approximately 3 minutes), to allow as many people as possible to express themselves in the time available. Given the strong and diverse public opinions expressed thus far, the Commission wants to ensure ample opportunity to hear all views as it considers this complex and important issue.
See workshop agenda
See FAQ
If you have questions or comments, please contact Tom Ascher, Planner, Columbia River Gorge Commission: ascher@gorgecommission.org .

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I was at the event about changing the Act on the 11th...for my first dose of info. Now that I am informed, here's my vote. NO NO NO!! Don't change the scenic act for these private developers. They can follow the rules like everyone else!
One of the justifications being used is that we need "housing" for persons who are just weekenders so they don't fill our urban boundary areas with McMansion vacation homes. So tell me, are we going to pass a law that says no more vacation homes or weekenders allowed to buy/build in urban growth boundaries? Yeah, right. Also, if you start looking at the big picture...
More than 900 lots being quietly subdivided in Husum/BZ area slated for development, much of it on SDS lands.
Proposal to move the urban growth boundary in Lyle and build up to 200 more homes.
Proposal to move The Dalles urban growth boundary..
And then there is the explosion of development in White Salmon.. and Bingen. And who knows what else is perking.
The Broughton Mill Development does not need to be bigger than already allowed by the gorge commision. STOP the change in the Scenic Act now. Look at all the proposed developments as part of a connected system that will have a major impact on the gorge and erode the Scenic Act.
I am also not convinced that this or other developments produces the tax base ... seems like a flash in the pan for the developers and construction persons while the work lasts... then we are left with 60 services jobs (probably with seasonal swings).. and no affordable housing..
Forget it. Let the Gorge Commission know how you feel, this is crazy. Early Riser

squeakywheel said...

First of all, I'm not against the Broughton development. I think it will bring business to the North Shore - not just to the Broughton area, but to White Salmon and Bingen businesses. In addition, Skamania County has lost a lot of revenue due to the decrease in logging over the years and because the majority of Skamania County is either in the Special Management Area of the Gorge Commission, or in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest, they could use more taxable properties.
I do question the 900 Husum area lots Anonymous refers to in their comments. I would suggest that even 90 would tend to be a high amount. Perhaps the individual could e-mail a copy of any proposal to whitesalmon2007@gorge.net so that all of us can evaluate it.
Also, I don't think SDS owns enough land along 141 to make that many lots-
I saw in the paper that Carl McNew has been appointed to the Gorge Commission by the Klickitat County Commissioners. I thought the Gorge Commission members were appointed by the Governors....has something changed here? Now, while I think Carl will do a good job, he does have a connection with SDS and HR Inn. Is that a conflict of sorts? Just wondering...

Anonymous said...

It took me less than one minute to research this:

(i) six members, comprised of one resident from each of the following counties: Hood River, Multnomah, and Wasco Counties, Oregon, and Clark, Klickitat, and Skamania Counties, Washington, to be appointed by the governing body of each of the respective counties: Provided, That in the event the governing body of a county fails to make such appointment, the Governor of the State in which the county is located shall appoint such member;
(ii) three members who reside in the State of Oregon, at least one of whom shall be a resident of the scenic area, to be appointed by the Governor of Oregon;
(iii) three members who reside in the State of Washington, at least one of whom shall be a resident of the scenic area, to be appointed by the Governor of Washington; and
(iv) one ex officio, nonvoting member who shall be an employee of the Forest Service, to be appointed by the Secretary.

Perhaps instead of blogging inaccurate accusations you should be doing your homework.

Heidi Struck


To bring up a new topic, drop us an email at whitesalmon2007@yahoo.com and we'll add your topic as a separate post.

To view all of the COMMENTS at once click the TITLE of the post and scroll down to read them. Then to return to all of the posts click the home button.

To easily follow the comments on a posting, click the 'subscribe' at the bottom of the comments for that post.